Nitya Legal ← Main site

Advisory & planning

The cheapest indirect tax dispute is the one that never starts. A position taken correctly at the outset — and documented at the time — usually costs a fraction of defending the same position five years later against a department that has had time to build its file.

What this covers

Why clients bring us this work

Our advisors’ opinions are regularly sought by Chartered Accountants, CFOs and senior management, and have in several instances been accepted at the policy-making level in Government and contributed to corrections in the indirect tax framework.

Common questions

We already have a Chartered Accountant. What does a separate opinion add?

A good deal of our advisory work comes to us through Chartered Accountants rather than around them. The value we add is on the litigation-facing question — how a position will be attacked, what the department has argued before, and what record needs to exist now for it to be defensible later.

Is a written opinion useful if a dispute arises anyway?

It frequently is. A reasoned opinion obtained before a position was taken is contemporaneous evidence of bona fides, which is directly relevant where the department alleges suppression or wilful misstatement to invoke the extended period.

Send us the notice. We will tell you where you stand.

The first call is a 20-minute assessment of your notice or order, treated in strict confidence.
+91 96677 91917  ·  contact.nityalegal@gmail.com  ·  Consultation form

Other areas GST litigation Customs law CESTAT representation Central excise & service tax Constitutional challenges
Reference GST rate notifications — all 151, 2017 to date